Taking the Line That Answers It
D3.1.3-5
Look at the source, then answer the questions.
A Contested National History
An extract from a national history published in 2011. This is a SECONDARY work making a causal claim other historians reject. REBUILDING: WHAT ACTUALLY DECIDED IT The author argues that shortages, not politics, set the pace of rebuilding. She points to the broadcast admitting bricks and timber ran short. Critics reply that the choice to use councils slowed the work. The author concedes she cannot separate the two causes with certainty. She rests her case on the quarterly figures the minister promised.
- 1. What do critics reply?
- 2. What evidence does she point to?
- 3. What does the author argue set the pace of rebuilding?
City Council Housing Report
A report presented to a city council's housing committee in 1950. PROGRESS ON THE HOUSING PROGRAMME Homes completed since 1946: 4,180. Families still on the waiting list: 11,600. Average wait for a family of five: seven years. Two sites were delayed by a shortage of bricks. The committee recommends building upward on cleared land.
- 1. What is the average wait for a family of five?
- 2. How many families remain on the waiting list?
- 3. Why were two sites delayed?
LessonPrint · D3.1.3-5 · Set 19 · free to copy for classroom use