Taking the Line That Answers It
D3.1.3-5
Look at the source, then answer the questions.
A Contested National History
An extract from a national history published in 2011. This is a SECONDARY work making a causal claim other historians reject. REBUILDING: WHAT ACTUALLY DECIDED IT The author argues that shortages, not politics, set the pace of rebuilding. She points to the broadcast admitting bricks and timber ran short. Critics reply that the choice to use councils slowed the work. The author concedes she cannot separate the two causes with certainty. She rests her case on the quarterly figures the minister promised.
- 1. What do critics reply?
- 2. What does the author argue set the pace of rebuilding?
- 3. What evidence does she point to?
Government White Paper on Housing
An extract from a white paper laid before Parliament by the government in 1946. HOUSING: THE GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSALS The war destroyed or damaged four million homes. The government proposes to build 300,000 homes a year. Local councils, not private builders, will lead the programme. Materials and labour remain scarce and must be allocated. The cost will fall on taxation and on borrowing.
- 1. How many homes were destroyed or damaged?
- 2. Who will lead the programme?
- 3. How many homes does the government propose to build each year?
LessonPrint · D3.1.3-5 · Set 8 · free to copy for classroom use